Write a concise, evidence-focused narrative that examines how media coverage and public perception influenced the Martha Moxley case and Michael Skakel’s conviction/review. Start with a clear thesis: media and legal processes interact to shape verdicts and post-conviction outcomes. Use at least three specific concepts (e.g., reasonable doubt, ineffective assistance of counsel, post-conviction relief) and illustrate them with concrete examples from the case and podcast reporting. Balance presenting the facts with critical analysis of biases and the limitations of both journalism and legal proceedings. End with a forward-looking question or recommendation on media literacy and due process in high-profile cases.